Saturday February 04, 2012



QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





Citizens should step up and assert power

The City is spending citizens’ tax dollars advertising against citizen taxpayers who dare question the Mayor’s push to have a second city. Great way to bring a community together.

The Mayor at Council meetings pontificates about democracy, as if all there is to it is marching out to vote every so often. Democracy requires a lot more: A free press, fair and unfettered elections including the Alternative Approval Process and referendum. The Mayor bucked and offered to intervene in the Alternative Approval Process that he chose in the summer, a process that leads to a referendum when citizens are fed up and gather signatures.

The Mayor now condemns the referendum he fathered. Speaking to the Chamber of Commerce on September 16, he said: “The Alternative Approval Process was democratic.” In the middle of the summer? The Mayor concluded: “We cannot govern by referendum. There is a proper place for referendum. This is not it.”

On September 25 the Yes campaign held its first rally, and co-chair Brian Sims said a ”referendum is not needed.” (Advertiser, p. 2) Numerous letters to the editor by the Yessers repeat the refrain of wasting money on a referendum. Wasting money on direct democracy where real estate developers have to convince more than six people.

A referendum is a legislative proposition referred to the voting population for approval or rejection. Even Premier Campbell on the STV referendum in May kept the government out of the people’s business. For fairness, Campbell’s government gave $500,000 to each side, the yes and the no, for information and education. To fund one side as the City is doing speaks volumes about Mayor Manjak’s “democracy.”

The City can’t even put out an intelligent ad. One ad states: “If East Hill expansion comes in, our library is likely to see more people. And our schools are likely to see more children, and it is our hope . . .” (Townsman, Oct. 28, p. 5). Two “likelies” and a “hope,” and this is our opportunity of a lifetime? This is a medieval speculative philosophy that aims to turn land into gold.

Citizens need to step up and assert their power. Citizens can see the realities more clearly and honestly than do our governing elites or the developers.

William G. Hills


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Daily Townsman welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Interactive Media: Information and Other Glacier Websites    © Copyright 2011 Glacier Interactive Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?