Thursday February 09, 2012



QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





S.W.Ont. doctor who performed mistaken mastectomies has privileges restored

WINDSOR, Ont. - A doctor who performed mistaken mastectomies at a southwestern Ontario hospital had her privileges restored Thursday, after the hospital imposed conditions it determined would ensure patients are not put at risk.

A panel had heard six hours of arguments from Dr. Barbara Heartwell's legal team Wednesday as well as arguments from the medical advisory committee at Hotel-Dieu Grace Hospital.

The board announced it was restoring Heartwell's privileges - with the condition that any elective cancer cases be reviewed by another surgeon for a period of three months, to be reviewed by the medical advisory committee monthly.

The committee is made up of physician leaders with privileges at the hospital.

"The board concludes that the conduct, performance and competence of Dr. Heartwell will not expose patients to harm or injury, nor is it reasonably likely to expose patients to harm or injury," said the decision, read at a news conference Thursday afternoon by hospital chairman Egideo Sovran.

The hospital said patients who do not wish to be treated by Heartwell will have the option of seeking another doctor in the area.

Heartwell voluntarily withdrew her surgical privileges on Feb. 23 after a second report of mistaken mastectomies came forward.

Three days later she withdrew her voluntary agreement and was suspended by the hospital.

A number of investigations were started after reports surfaced that two women who had mastectomies at the hospital did not have cancer.

Laurie Johnson, of Leamington, Ont., has filed a lawsuit after having a mastectomy at the hospital last November and then learning she did not have cancer.

Janice Laporte filed a similar lawsuit after having a breast removed by Heartwell at the same hospital in September 2001.

She can't discuss the proceedings because of a confidentiality clause but the court case has ended.

A provincial investigation will also look at other hospitals in the area.


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Daily Townsman welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus


About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Interactive Media: Information and Other Glacier Websites    © Copyright 2011 Glacier Interactive Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?