Thursday February 09, 2012



QUESTION OF THE WEEK

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





Marine security trumps privacy as union loses legal bid against screening

OTTAWA - Longshoremen have lost a legal bid to contest marine security regulations they call an unwarranted invasion of their privacy.

The Supreme Court of Canada announced Thursday that it won't hear a challenge from the International Longshore and Warehouse Union of Canada.

At issue was the Federal Court of Appeal's ruling that the Marine Transportation Security Regulations do not violate the employees' constitutional guarantees.

The regulations, which allow authorities to screen marine workers with sensitive jobs, were brought in after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

The information gathered from workers includes details about the employees, their spouses and friends, as well as other personal background.

Port workers area also subject to a criminal record check and, if deemed necessary, a security assessment by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

The union and several local units, mainly in Vancouver, objected and took their case to court.

Calls to the union seeking comment were not returned.

Mark Erdman, of Port Metro Vancouver, said he couldn't comment directly on the high court's decision.

But he said it will be "business as usual" at the port, where personnel have been undergoing security clearance checks for a few years.

"We've been doing the security screenings," he said, adding that the measures had to be put into place in order to comply with international security standards.

"We have to have security background checks for anyone who is accessing secure areas of the port."

In introducing the new security measures, the federal government pointed out that background checks have been in place at airports since 1985.

However, in the statement of claim filed with B.C. Supreme Court, the union said the regulations are "unconstitutionally vague and overbroad" and open the door to differential treatment for employees based on their marital and family status.

It also said they restrict port workers' rights "to associate with various organizations and groups for social, cultural, political, religious and ideological reasons."


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Daily Townsman welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus


About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Interactive Media: Information and Other Glacier Websites    © Copyright 2011 Glacier Interactive Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?