National News

NASA launches carbon satellite after 2009 failure

In this image released by NASA, a Delta 2 rocket with the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 satellite sits on the launch pad about 8 minutes before launch at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., Wednesday morning, July 2, 2014. The goal of the $468 million mission, designed to last at least two years, is to study the processes behind how the environment absorbs carbon dioxide. (AP Photo/NASA, Bill Ingalls) MANDATORY CREDIT -
In this image released by NASA, a Delta 2 rocket with the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 satellite sits on the launch pad about 8 minutes before launch at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., Wednesday morning, July 2, 2014. The goal of the $468 million mission, designed to last at least two years, is to study the processes behind how the environment absorbs carbon dioxide. (AP Photo/NASA, Bill Ingalls) MANDATORY CREDIT
— image credit:

By The Associated Press

VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. - A rocket carrying a NASA satellite lit up the pre-dawn skies Wednesday on a mission to track the chief culprit behind global warming.

The Delta 2 rocket blasted off from Vandenberg Air Force Base along the central California coast and speeded toward low-Earth orbit. It was to separate from the global warming satellite about an hour after liftoff.

The launch was cancelled on Tuesday morning because of an equipment failure.

NASA tried in 2009 to launch a satellite dedicated to studying carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas caused by the burning of fossil fuels. A satellite plunged into the ocean off Antarctica after a hardware failure with the Taurus XL rocket.

After the loss, NASA spent several years and millions of dollars building a near-identical twin.

Like the original, the satellite known as Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2, or OCO-2 for short, will sniff for carbon dioxide from 438 miles (705 kilometres) above the Earth's surface.

About 40 billion tons of carbon dioxide are released yearly from factories and cars. About half of the greenhouse gas is trapped in the atmosphere, while the rest is sucked up by trees and oceans.

The goal of the $468 million mission, designed to last at least two years, is to study the processes behind how the environment absorbs carbon dioxide.

NASA spent more money on the new mission, mainly because it's using a more expensive rocket. Engineers also had to replace obsolete satellite parts, which drove up the price tag.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Election 2014: Lorraine Baldwin seeks Board of Education seat
 
Man shot in Maple Ridge
 
B.C. cities demand greater oil pipeline scrutiny, safety
Province wants strike savings back, SD43 not ready to comment
 
Accident at Dogwood and Rockland
 
Rockets look to build on fast start to 2014 WHL season
PCU-WHS officially opens with first degree program
 
Nanaimo group seeks more women in politics
 
Here’s the lowdown on CVRD’s flowdown

Community Events, September 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Sep 29 edition online now. Browse the archives.